Australian national media reveals secretive AI data center buildout across multiple sites, highlighting scale of Australian compute infrastructure expansion.

Data centres have become the hidden infrastructure powering almost every aspect of modern life—from online banking and streaming services to artificial intelligence. Yet as Australia races to become a global hub for the digital economy, growing numbers of communities are questioning whether the benefits justify the environmental and social costs.

The industry's rapid expansion is transforming landscapes, driving unprecedented electricity and water demand, and fueling local opposition to developments planned near homes and farmland. At its core lies a fundamental question: how much is Australia willing to sacrifice to power the AI revolution?

For Southern Highlands cattle farmer Ros Murphy, the issue has become deeply personal. Her family has bred beef cattle on the same property near Moss Vale since 1927—generations of history, hard work, and resilience. She now fears the farm's future could be threatened by plans for a large data centre and gas-fired power station nearby. Though unfamiliar with AI, Murphy worries that emissions from the proposed development could contaminate her livestock and jeopardize the farm's viability. "If they're eating it and drinking it every day and it's going into their bodies, it's going to leave a residue," she said. "The meatworks won't take them."

Despite their low public profile, data centres underpin nearly every digital interaction. Professor Ali Mirjalili, an AI researcher at Torrens University, compares them to essential infrastructure like roads, airports, and rail networks. "Every time we use social media, every time we use our banking system, our government websites, data centres are doing the job behind the scenes," he said.

The next generation goes further still. "We don't even call them data centres," Mirjalili explained. "We call them hyperscale AI factories because technically they manufacture intelligence. They don't just store data."

Australia currently operates around 160 data centres, with another 90 proposed or under construction, mostly concentrated in major cities where power, telecommunications infrastructure, and customer access are strongest. Mirjalili notes that Australia's political stability, available land, and renewable energy potential make it an attractive destination for global investment. Indeed, Australia was the world's second-largest destination for data centre investment last year, behind only the United States.

Belinda Dennett, founder and CEO of industry body Data Centres Australia, emphasizes the facilities' critical role in everyday services. "Your Netflix, your Spotify, your email, your cloud, your OpenAI prompts—all that happens in the servers and chips you see here," she said during a facility tour. She argues the industry represents a major economic opportunity and positions Australia to compete in the global AI race. "If Australia wants to be in this market, we need to move quickly."

The industry's explosive growth is driving unprecedented electricity demand. Data centres currently consume around 2 per cent of Australia's total electricity. By 2030, that figure is projected to rise to approximately 6 per cent, with some forecasts suggesting demand could reach between 10 and 15 per cent by 2040. Mirjalili warns Australia is unprepared. "We simply do not have proper infrastructure and we don't generate enough electricity to be able to power these hyperscale data centres," he said.

He likens the facilities to "spaceships" landing in Australian cities. "When you're talking about a few hundred households, which used to be the case in traditional data centres, it wasn't an issue," he explained. "But if you bring 10 of those spaceships, it's like you're adding five million or 10 million new households. Can we manage that? I don't think so."

Mirjalili also warns that without major investment in energy infrastructure, Australians could face higher electricity prices. "There are no laws requiring them to source new energy. They heavily rely on existing water and electricity infrastructure."

Dennett counters that the solution is not slowing construction but accelerating energy generation investment. "What we need to do is speed up sorting out the power issue," she said. A government spokesperson responded: "Data centres are one of the biggest drivers of new energy demand. We're acting to make them an asset to the energy grid, not a strain. If data centres want to benefit from Australia's energy grid, we think they should do their bit to strengthen it. It's clear that the overwhelming majority of states agree."

Cooling thousands of servers also requires significant water consumption. Sydney's data centres currently consume about 3.5 billion litres of drinking water annually, though Sydney Water has projected demand could rise sharply over the next decade. Dennett disputes those forecasts, arguing they are based on maximum peak demand rather than actual annual usage.

In Melbourne's West Footscray, residents say the expansion of nearby data centres has exposed shortcomings in Australia's planning system. Sebastian Leith, a local resident, accepts that data centres are necessary but believes they should not be built so close to residential neighbourhoods. "They're a necessary evil. They could do so much for Australia. This one in particular has been handled so badly," he said.

Residents have raised concerns about construction disruption, noise, pollution, blackouts, and property value impacts. Sean Brown, who lives near an Australian company NEXTDC facility, says community consultation has been inadequate. "No one from the data centre industry has contacted us," he said. Brown has also been monitoring air quality around the site due to concerns over emissions from diesel backup generators. "No Australian child should be exposed to this risk just so people who don't live here can make millions of dollars," he said.

NEXTDC responded that it operates the generators under "established operational procedures," adding that activities are carried out in line with "relevant planning approvals, environmental requirements, safety regulations and compliance obligations."

In Moss Vale, community opposition centres on a proposal to power a major data centre using three gas-fired power stations. If approved, it would become one of New South Wales' largest gas-powered facilities. Greens councillor Heather Champion argues the proposal is incompatible with Australia's climate commitments. "Why would we build a gas plant that's going to be pumping out two million tonnes of carbon emissions every year?" she said.

The site's owner, Nakar Property, declined an interview but stated in planning documents that renewable energy options were considered before gas was deemed the most suitable solution. The company says predicted emissions are unlikely to create unacceptable environmental impacts.

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, Australia's digital infrastructure will continue to expand. Supporters argue data centres are essential to economic growth, technological innovation, and national competitiveness. Critics contend the industry must not outpace planning, infrastructure, and environmental safeguards.

Professor Mirjalili believes the answer lies between the two positions. "We need to be moving very cautiously at the same time. We don't want to compromise our natural resources at the cost of these data centres. It's a good opportunity, but it should be managed properly."