한국의 개정된 국가보안법이 발효되며, 반도체 기술 유출에 대해 최대 30년의 징역형을 부과한다.
South Korea will formally implement its substantially revised Espionage Act this weekend, under which anyone leaking sensitive technology to any "foreign country or organization equivalent to a foreign country" will face up to 30 years in prison. The move marks the first time South Korea has elevated industrial secret theft from the level of corporate crime to that of a national security threat, reflecting the country's deep anxiety over the erosion of its memory chip technology edge.
As the home base of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, South Korea has long dominated the global memory chip sector. Yet rapid catch-up from China is shaking that position. According to South Korean police data, half of all sensitive technology leak cases involving foreign entities uncovered last year were tied to China.
The previous law had a critical limitation: the definition of "espionage" applied only to individuals proven to be spying for North Korea. That narrow scope left courts constrained when handling technology leak cases involving other countries. The new law removes that restriction entirely.
South Korea's Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan acknowledged the immense pressure last month. "China's speed is beyond imagination. That's why I feel a strong sense of urgency," he said.
The urgency stems from the semiconductor industry's central role in South Korea's economy. Robust demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips continues to drive South Korean semiconductor exports as a critical engine of economic growth. Seoul is doubling down further, with the government recently unveiling an $880 billion plan to build a massive semiconductor hub in the southern region to cement its leadership in global chip manufacturing.
Samsung and SK Hynix are already feeling pressure from Chinese competitors. Companies such as YMTC and CXMT are steadily narrowing the gap with South Korean firms in global memory chip market share. A high-profile case underscores the severity of technology leaks: the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office disclosed that ten former Samsung Electronics employees were indicted for allegedly leaking technology to CXMT, an incident that reportedly cost Samsung ₩5 trillion (approximately $3.7 billion) in sales in 2024.
Jon Woo-jung, a professor specializing in intellectual property at KAIST, pointed to a pattern in how Chinese companies operate. "When Chinese companies need Korean technology, they maintain a list of relevant experts and reach out to these individuals, offering high salaries and generous benefits," he said.
South Korea's intensified crackdown on industrial espionage reflects broader geopolitical pressures. Since 2024, the United States has imposed sweeping export controls on China and has continuously urged allies to restrict sales of advanced chips and chipmaking equipment to China. In February this year, the Pentagon blacklisted CXMT on national security grounds. Ben Forney of corporate intelligence firm Lazlo Intelligence described the U.S. posture: "The Americans are telling South Korea: 'Don't be the weak link. Stop leaking all your technology to China. Stop leaving your supply chains exposed. Stop letting China invest in sensitive industries, because it ultimately affects the United States too.'"
Taiwan criminalized economic espionage in 2022, with legislation specifically targeting technology transfers to China—a regional trend South Korea is now echoing.
Major South Korean chipmakers say they have taken preventive measures. SK Hynix stated it has established various security processes and systems to prevent technology leaks both domestically and internationally, but declined to share specifics. Samsung declined to comment.
Responding to U.S. pressure on South Korea, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the Chinese government has always required Chinese enterprises to conduct international cooperation in compliance with international rules and regulations. It also stated that all countries should safeguard the normal investment and business activities of enterprises and provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory business environment for them.
Although the revised South Korean law does not explicitly name China, China's rapid progress in semiconductors is undoubtedly the core driver behind Seoul's legislative action. Recent reports from the South Korean government and industry have issued repeated warnings that China may soon overtake South Korea in memory chips. Whether South Korea's legislative measures can effectively curb technology spillover through talent mobility remains to be seen.