A Substack analysis explores whether investing $17 million in on-site battery storage can effectively bypass five-year grid interconnection queues for new data center capacity.
The average time from interconnection request to commercial operation for a U.S. power project reached 55 months in 2024, up from 22 months in 2008.² For large data center loads in constrained markets, the delay is even steeper: projects entering service in PJM during 2025 averaged more than seven years from application to operation.⁸ A new data center typically requires 12 to 24 months to build, yet securing grid connection takes three times as long.
That asymmetry carries a steep price. At $2.6 million per megawatt per year in colocation revenue—the 2025 global average—every year of interconnection delay on a 31 MW facility erodes roughly $80 million in potential revenue.¹⁶ Until the grid connection clears, the data center remains unbuilt, the racks unfilled, and the contracts unsigned.
This analysis is published through Energy Industry Insights from Avanza Energy, a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support this work, consider subscribing.
Timeline compression at constrained nodes allows the battery-enabled path to align interconnection with construction rather than adding years afterward. A 31 MW facility forfeits roughly $80 million annually in deferred revenue during a traditional queue wait. Sources: LBNL 2025 “Queued Up” report (55-month national average, PJM 7+ years); Calibrant/Aligned press release, October 2025; Latitude Media/Crusoe reporting, June 2025; datacenterHawk 2026 ($2.6M/MW/yr).
In October 2025, Calibrant Energy and Aligned Data Centers announced a solution to this bottleneck. They deployed a 31 MW / 62 MWh battery energy storage system (BESS) at Aligned’s new campus in Hillsboro, Oregon—not as backup power or for grid arbitrage, but as a deliberate instrument to accelerate interconnection with Portland General Electric (PGE). According to Calibrant’s press release, this marks “the first time in the US that a battery system is purpose-built and sited to accelerate interconnection for a large-scale data center.”¹
The outcome, according to Aligned CEO Andrew Schaap, allows the facility to come online “years earlier than would be possible with traditional utility upgrades.”¹
One transaction does not establish a trend. Is this a pioneering step in an emerging category, or an unusually creative one-off? Do the economics hold up when evaluated against accurate, scale-segmented cost figures? Furthermore, what do the counter-signals—natural gas still dominating behind-the-meter strategies, evolving regulatory frameworks, and FEOC supply-chain uncertainties—suggest about the pace at which this model can scale?
This analysis weighs both perspectives. Based on the best available public evidence, the verdict points to an emerging trend with strong analytical merit, though the named-deal pipeline remains thin.
The Calibrant BESS is front-of-meter (FTM), situated on the grid side of the utility meter rather than within the data center’s perimeter. PGE manages the system through its Dispatchable Standby Generation (DSG) program.¹ The data center itself spans 72 MW, meaning the 31 MW battery accounts for approximately 43% of peak load capacity. This configuration allows Aligned to gradually ramp from initial power delivery to full-rated load as grid capacity opens up, while the battery supplies the utility with critical flexibility during the transition.
The mechanism operates through strategic discharge during peak demand periods, effectively reducing the net draw on a constrained transmission node. By demonstrating that the load can be curtailed or self-supplied during peak constraint windows, the operator secures PGE approval for full-rated interconnection without awaiting transmission capacity expansions. The battery does not serve as backup power; instead, it delivers grid flexibility—a utility-managed service that grants the data center earlier access to the grid.
Andrew Schaap summarized the approach clearly: “With this BESS, we're converting our load from a potential grid liability into a dynamic grid asset, providing the regional utility with the tools needed to accelerate our ramp.”¹
Calibrant CEO Phil Martin echoed this sentiment: “Rather than the false choice between waiting years for system upgrades or having to go off grid entirely, we're working with leading data center providers like Aligned to use distributed energy solutions to facilitate and accelerate grid interconnection.”¹
The Aligned/Calibrant project operates within a broader PGE and GridCARE initiative. GridCARE’s DeFlex platform integrates generative AI demand forecasting with flexible resources—including batteries and onsite generation—to model and approve data center interconnections at constrained nodes without requiring transmission infrastructure builds. The program has already unlocked 80 MW of incremental data center capacity in Hillsboro for 2026, with a pipeline exceeding 400 MW through 2029.⁹ With multiple operators now participating, the Aligned transaction evolves from a singular creative experiment into an anchor deal within a structured, utility-managed framework.
Another critical detail concerns the stakeholders driving this decision: Aligned Data Centers is currently being acquired by an entity backed by BlackRock Global Infrastructure Partners and the Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Partnership (AIP). AIP was co-founded by Microsoft, NVIDIA, and MGX.²² When the world’s largest infrastructure investor alongside the dominant AI chip and cloud providers select grid-adjacent BESS as their interconnection strategy, it ceases to be a startup experiment.
The interconnection delays that make the Aligned strategy valuable are not receding. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s 2025 “Queued Up” report underscores the trajectory: average queue times reached 55 months in 2024, rising from 36 months in 2015 and 22 months in 2008.² The total active U.S. interconnection queue has swelled to approximately 2,290 gigawatts.² In 2024 alone, over 700 GW were withdrawn from queues as developers walked away after years of stagnation.
The outlook is even starker for large loads. ERCOT received 198 GW of large-load interconnection applications in a single quarter of 2026, with the roughly 86 GW currently under active review alone matching ERCOT’s entire existing peak load.¹¹ In highly constrained regions such as Northern Virginia and Silicon Valley, interconnection queues routinely stretch to seven years or more.¹⁷ As previously documented in our analysis of how grid bottlenecks are reshaping data center development, the Northern Virginia queue alone extended to seven years in 2025—the direct catalyst for the sector’s first construction slowdown since 2020.
A data center typically moves from groundbreaking to powered infrastructure in 12 to 24 months.²⁰ Securing grid connection takes three times longer. “Speed to power is the biggest prerequisite” for U.S. data center developers. Every operator seeks faster interconnection; the critical question is which instrument delivers it most effectively.
A December 2025 whitepaper from Princeton University’s ZERO Lab, Camus Energy, and encoord quantifies an alternative pathway: a 500 MW data center utilizing flexible grid connections (FGC) paired with a bring-your-own-capacity (BYOC) structure can reach full operation three to five years ahead of traditional interconnection timelines.¹⁰ Applied to actual PJM transmission data, the analysis estimates cost savings of $78 million per gigawatt of new demand for FGC alone, with the combined FGC and BYOC approach yielding $404 million in savings per GW.¹⁰
Traditional BESS investments are typically justified through energy arbitrage—buying low and selling high. For the Aligned model, that framework is largely irrelevant. The primary value driver is the net present value (NPV) generated by powering server racks two to three years earlier.
Accurate financial modeling demands scale-correct cost figures, excluding residential or blended-market pricing.
The Aligned/Calibrant installation is a large, front-of-meter, utility-coordinated BESS—a segment where pricing is substantially lower than commercial or residential alternatives. NREL’s 2025 updated cost projections benchmark utility-scale four-hour systems at approximately $210/kWh.²³ Wood Mackenzie’s H1 2025 U.S. utility-scale energy storage pricing report places post-tariff large FTM systems between $230 and $320/kWh.²⁶ By comparison, small commercial and industrial (C&I) systems range from $250 to $450/kWh, while residential installations command $700 to $1,300/kWh.²⁵ The scale-driven cost advantage is both substantial and well-documented.
Applied to the 62 MWh Aligned/Calibrant system, these benchmarks yield a capital expenditure range of approximately $13 million to $20 million, with a midpoint near $17 million.²³, ²⁶ This corrects earlier estimates of $25 million derived from C&I-scale pricing, and stands far below residential market rates.
Against that capital outlay, the revenue opportunity unlocked by accelerated interconnection is substantial:
According to datacenterHawk’s 2026 pricing guide, the 2025 global average colocation rate stood at approximately $217 per kilowatt per month, equating to $2.6 million per MW per year.¹⁶ In constrained markets such as Northern Virginia and Silicon Valley, rates exceed $250/kW per month.¹⁶ Landgate’s analysis of 5 MW data center facilities places annual revenue between $1.1 million and $2.8 million per MW, varying by utilization and regional market conditions.¹⁵
For Aligned’s 72 MW facility, two years of accelerated commercial operation at the $2.6 million per MW per year global average, discounted at 10%, generates approximately $140 million in present value.¹⁵, ¹⁶ Against battery capital expenditures ranging from $13 million to $20 million, the NPV ratio is 7